Personal Development, Shamanism and Self Help

Protecting Children From Toxic Toys

Posted by Ina Woolcott

Protecting one’s children is of utmost important to parents. Unfortunately, it is now necessary to educate ourselves about how to keep our children safe from potentially harmful chemicals in their toys.

In addition to phthalates, lead, cadmium, arsenic, mercury, bromine, antimony, chromium, tin, xylene, toluene, and bisphenol-A should all be avoided in children’s toys.

One mistake parents make is assuming that products must be proven safe before they can be sold and they trust that the government wouldn’t allow unsafe toys to be sold. Government regulations are very outdated and ineffective when it comes to the ever-changing world of chemicals and their use in consumer products.

To read more:
Protecting Children From Toxic Toys

Artificial Colouring in Food and Drinks Can Cause Cancer

By Ina Woolcott

As long as I can remember, my mum never bought anything containing artificial colourings, flavourings, sweeteners or E numbers. I remember her checking the ingredients every time we went shopping. I never really questioned her, just had an inherent trust that she knew what is best. THANKS MUM

… and I am now passing this same knowledge onto my daughter. I never really knew why artificial colours etc were so bad back then, and as I got older it made sense to me that you just don’t eat anything artificial, as this implies it is fake! Anyhow, I received this from the Natural News website I am subscribed to and would like to share it with others who are interested or who happen to come acroos this posting. Very interesting and educational…

Have you ever wondered why companies use artificial colors? You might think it’s because they want to make their food look good, but there’s another reason - a far deeper reason - why companies use artificial colorus to make their foods more appealing to consumers. Keep reading to learn what that is…

How Food companies Fool Consumers with Food Coloring Ingredients Made from Petrochemicals

Popular GREEN products test positive for toxicant

By Ina Woolcott

Surprise - Surprise

I was already aware that so called eco, organic, green, natural products etc are often full of ‘crap’, so reading this article came as no surprise. Personally, I only use Products of Mistry’s, for me and my daughter, and I also converted my mum to this product line after making her privy to what was really in all the apparently ‘good for you and good for the environment products’…

“New tests of 100 “natural” and “organic” soaps, shampoos and other consumer products show that nearly half of them contained a cancer-causing chemical that is a byproduct of petrochemicals used in manufacturing.”

…read the full article from the LA Times here.

Deforestation of the Worlds Rainforests

By Ina Woolcott

The sad reality about deforestation… at this present time 12 million hectares are cleared annually. Human forest dwellers are losing their home, shelter and the animals and plants that sustain them. When the land is cleared, there is less rainfall and the once harmonious ecosystem is out of sync.

It is incomprehensible that human beings with good conscience and intentions would even agree to pick up a chainsaw and cut down the earths lungs on a mass scale. Perhaps their souls and conscience are easily sold for money. This is not right though and should not be allowed.

Deforestation

For related information click on the link below:
Environmental Charities

Jon Rappoport - Interview of Ex-Vaccine Researcher

By Ina Woolcott

At the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system.

I love this interview between John Rappoport and an ex-vaccine researcher. The ex researcher does not want to reveal which vaccines he worked with, as he doesn’t not want to be harassed by the FBI or even the IRS if his identity is revealed. He knows a few people to whom this has happened.

A compelling read that makes sense on every level.

Some excerpts:

Q: There are medical historians who state that the overall decline of illnesses was not due to vaccines.

A: I know. For a long time, I ignored their work.

Q: Why?

A: Because I was afraid of what I would find out. I was in the business of developing vaccines. My livelihood depended on continuing that work.

Q What contaminants did you find in your many years of work with vaccines?

A: … I’ll give you some of what I came across, and I’ll also give you what colleagues of mine found. Here’s a partial list. In the Rimavex measles vaccine, we found various chicken viruses. In polio vaccine, we found acanthamoeba, which is a so-called “brain-eating” amoeba. Simian cytomegalovirus in polio vaccine. Simian foamy virus in the rotavirus vaccine. Bird-cancer viruses in the MMR vaccine. Various micro-organisms in the anthrax vaccine. I’ve found potentially dangerous enzyme inhibitors in several vaccines. Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses in the rubella vaccine. Avian leucosis virus in the flu vaccine. Pestivirus in the MMR vaccine…Of course, I’m not even mentioning the standard chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminum which are purposely put into vaccines.

A: no long-term studies are done on any vaccines. Long-term follow-up is not done in any careful way. Why? Because, again, the assumption is made that vaccines do not cause problems. So why should anyone check? On top of that, a vaccine reaction is defined so that all bad reactions are said to occur very soon after the shot is given. But that does not make sense… the vaccine obviously acts in the body for a long period of time after it is given. A reaction can be gradual. Deterioration can be gradual. Neurological problems can develop over time. They do in various conditions, even according to a conventional analysis. So why couldn’t that be the case with vaccines? If chemical poisoning can occur gradually, why couldn’t that be the case with a vaccine which contains mercury?

Foot Note:
Perhaps you know that Tony Blair’s wife is involved with alternative health. There is the possibility that their child has not been given the MMR. Blair recently side-stepped the question in press interviews, and made it seem that he was simply objecting to invasive questioning of his “personal and family life.”